Dairy and beef producers should first identify poor feed hygiene contributors in order to best combat their effects.
As new and different farm management schemes are adopted and new ensiling technology continues to emerge to improve feed fermentation across all sectors of the agriculture industry, the opportunities for improved feed hygiene also grow. The term “feed hygiene” refers to the anti-nutritional factors that affect the purity and sanitation of feeds — from the field, to fermentation and through feeding. Even while knowledge in the sector of anti-nutritional factors continues to grow and management factors that contribute to poor feed hygiene are identified, an easy solution to combat all of these aspects remains unfound.
“We are recognizing bacterial loads in feedstuffs to a far greater extent than ever before, and they are appearing in more places than ever before,” says John Goeser, Rock River Laboratory animal nutrition, research and innovation director. “For instance, clostridia outbreaks are usually resigned to just haylage, but we can also find these bacteria in corn silage and even TMR (total mixed rations).” Goeser explains that when anti-nutritional factors, like fungi or pathogenic bacteria, are present in feed, it is a sign of contamination.
“These anti-nutritional factors arise from feed contaminations and management practices like dirty buckets, tracking dirt into feed, spoiled feed polluting fresh feed in mixers, and bird excrement, in addition to being field-borne,” explains Goeser.
Regardless of how the contamination occurs, Goeser explains that animal health challenges likely spawn from multiple compounding factors. He focuses upon four major contributing categories.
“The first thing producers and their consultants should do is identify what they are dealing with,” advises Goeser. “Review the four contributing areas, then utilize analysis and on-farm assessment to determine what the animals are up against.”
1. Fungal contamination from mold, yeast and mycotoxins
“Mold, yeast and mycotoxins are relatively well-understood compared to other factors here, but there is always more to learn,” says Goeser. He recommends analyzing feedstuffs that are suspect for any of these anti-nutritional factors. “Depending on the analysis chosen, a producer can determine the level of the mold, yeast or mycotoxin in the feed, and in some cases, even identify the species.”
2. Environmental and management stress
“Temperature swings, overcrowding, poor cow comfort or anything else that stresses animals can contribute to a less-than-optimal immune system response,” explains Goeser. He shares that when an animal is stressed, cortisol is released, which in turn suppresses the immune system’s ability to fight pathogens, ultimately showing up in the form of a sick animal.
3. Nutritional stress
“Nutritional stressors such as variations in feeding, inconsistent feed delivery or slug feeding, not pushing feed up frequently enough, delivering the wrong diet, or poor starch digestibility can really wreak havoc — especially on ruminants,” states Goeser.
He explains that ill starch digestibility can result in an influx of grain into the hindgut.
“If it doesn’t digest in the rumen, compensatory digestion in the small intestine takes place, which may provide an environment for pathogenic, opportunistic fungi or bacteria.”
4. Pathogenic or efficiency-robbing bacterial load
“A successful fermentation should wipe out many bad bacteria,” says Goeser. “For example, enterobacterial populations, which are generally undesirable, have been shown to be completely eliminated by a successful silage fermentation.”
He adds that keeping bacteria at bay or killing them off is part of the fermentation process. However, inadequate fermentation from oxygen infiltration via poor seals or plastic damage, aerobic feed spoilage, or feed contamination at feedout (i.e., mud or manure getting into the TMR) can result in the presence of bad bacterial loads.
Every farm is different
“Each farm is a petri dish, and each farm is different,” says Goeser. “Producers should consider that which they can’t see — there is a lot more going on than meets the eye.”
Goeser cites various areas as possible contributors to the continually growing feed contaminations, including greater anti-nutritional factors in the fields following changes in tillage practices or warmer and wetter conditions. Rock River Laboratory has also recognized a seemingly linear increase in log counts of feedstuff fungal measures for the past five to seven years.
“Cows can usually fight off the low-level factors without an impact on their health,” says Goeser. “But increased contaminant intakes with today’s high-producing herds, combined with mycotoxins or stress, are bringing high-production cows to breaking points.”
Merging veterinary and nutritional science
As bacterial challenges arise and grow into clinical outbreaks, a veterinarian’s insight may be needed to assess and provide antibiotics, etc., in addition to a nutritionist’s assessment. Goeser advises producers to work with both their nutritionist and veterinarian to minimize or rid the herd of the animal health challenges.
“Develop a strategy with your veterinarian and nutritionist to combat the identified subject,” recommends Goeser. “Consider running a TMR hygiene diagnostic test and put a strategy in place with a goal to greatly diminish or completely banish all on-farm feed contamination.”
Poor feed hygiene combined with compromised animal immune status and feed management lapses packs a punch, with the potential to put large groups in the sick pen. Regardless of the type of animals fed, producers should proactively monitor feed visually and with analysis to assess risk factors that are either obvious or invisible to the human eye. By putting protocols in place for successful fermentation, the risks of anti-nutritional factors are reduced, but more often than not, proactive nutritional management strategies should be followed as more and more detriments to good feed hygiene surface.
Source: Buffy Uglow is the marketing and communications director for Rock River Laboratory.